ext_14350 ([identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] slemslempike 2006-10-25 01:40 pm (UTC)

This is probably the best explanation of Mornington Crescent. I can't actually remember which variation of the rules were in play on Sunday, though it did involve penalties for a successive player when in mainline stations. Fortunately none of the players were deemed successful, so it didn't matter overly.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting