ext_14350 ([identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] slemslempike 2007-06-07 03:53 pm (UTC)

They could so easily have just called this "the dangerous book" and had it non-gendered in instructions. Well, these particular authors seem like they couldn't possibly have done that for fear of their penes mutating into lovehearts, but in general, it is possible as well as desirable not to further reinforce gender lines.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting