ext_14350 ([identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] slemslempike 2007-10-17 11:15 am (UTC)

It was only going to be up as an optional extra for them to read (so about three of them would) - I can't fit it into my seminars for the moment at least, so I won't put it up without a discussion. Also, it's not really a good basis for looking at assumptions. It's not a terribly discursive or reflexive paper, just statistics, so there isn't anything for them to get their teeth into.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting