slemslempike: (Default)
slemslempike ([personal profile] slemslempike) wrote2004-11-24 04:57 pm

Getting progressively saner...

What could someone do to a horse to sabotage it without being obvious?
Sugar in the tank?

quickies, make out session etc in old english?
(this is one of the ones where the thread is mostly rebuffing suggestions “well, I didn’t mean Old English, I meant old English. Obviously.”

A 'home' prostitute? *AND* A place with low mountains, wide valleys and big waterfalls?
Holy juxtaposition!

Weasels and edibility
Take treacle and rice. Mix together for an explosive taste!

[identity profile] tamnonlinear.livejournal.com 2004-11-24 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)
What could someone do to a horse to sabotage it without being obvious?
Sugar in the tank?


*snerk*

Good one.

[identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com 2004-11-26 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I-thank-you! I also take somewhat smug pride in the fact that sugar wouldn't work in a tank any more than it would slow down a horse.

[identity profile] agent-000.livejournal.com 2004-11-24 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Gosh, I got a taste of Middle English with the Beowulf unit from last year, and honestly, it is a completely different language; old English might as well have a different alphabet. :-p
Weasels? If people can eat groundhogs (woodchucks), which are fatty, flea ridden, and usually blown apart by the hunting process, then weasels are surely fair game.
Bon apetit?

[identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com 2004-11-26 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Yup, which is precisely why the poster shouldn't have said "Old English" (especially since in her time period we hadn't got to OE yet), and used something like "archaic phrases".

I didn't know woodchucks were the samething as groundhogs! I've been imagining a bird whenever I see that. *lives and learns*