Date: 2006-11-09 07:26 pm (UTC)
morganmuffle: (0)
From: [personal profile] morganmuffle
I've come to the conclusion that the original article/statement/whatever it was from Ekklesia was just very badly written. On the BBC boards everyone's getting het up about the words "article of faith" because they're interpreting it as the guy saying the red poppy is a religious thing whereas I think he meant faith with a little f which it sort of is. And the PC thing I can sort of see too (if you don't wear one then you get shouted down a bit as happened when Huw Edwards had on the wrong jacket or some similar explanation last week) which has a similar feel to a lot of PC/non PC arguments.

It's just all a bit, as if they haven't researched white poppies and haven't really thought what the words they are saying will mean to people... Possibly I can see their point and occasionally I do feel a bit odd wearing a red poppy but to be honest my solution is to buy one to support the RBL and then not wear it. It mostly makes my head hurt.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

slemslempike: (Default)
slemslempike

July 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 07:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios