slemslempike: (Default)
[personal profile] slemslempike
People putting punctuation inside quotation marks. I know it's the rule for North Americans, but it's wrong and people should be better.

Having to count how many "r"s different writers use for "grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrl" (it's usually substantially fewer than that) because this easy-flowing, self-defining, reclaiming thing is ALL WELL AND GOOD, but I am all about consistency and standards and blanket rules that stifle all creative expression.

I'm HUNGRY and all my food is in my office.

Date: 2009-07-20 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sinsense.livejournal.com
And be horribly murdered by some ax-wielding psychopath, no doubt! Your callous disregard for the safety of punctuation is chilling.

(Sadly, punctuation outside the quotation marks looks about as bad as punctuation outside the parentheses to me. Wait-- do You People do that too?)

Date: 2009-07-20 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sollersuk.livejournal.com
Definitely. In your example, question mark inside the parentheses because it refers to the sentence that starts "Wait". But I wouldn't have the two sentences as separate paragraphs, as if they were, the second wouldn't need parentheses; they'd be in the same paragraph and the full stop after "chilling" would come after the parentheses because the whole lot belongs together.

Date: 2009-07-20 11:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sinsense.livejournal.com
The parenthetical remark is not intended to be a comment on the chilling disregard for the safety of full stops and commas, though. It is meant to be a fully separate aside. Perhaps we have different writing styles.

Edit: Ah ha! I'm sorry, I was perplexed by your editorial commentary and didn't get what you were saying about parentheticals (I see what you mean, now, and yes, the systems are the same on that point).
Edited Date: 2009-07-20 11:39 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-07-20 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
It is this sort of nanny-state thinking that has lead to the disappearance of appropriate punctuation from public signs, leaving the way clear for the rogue apostrophe to do it's* worst!

If the sentence inside the parentheses is incomplete, then no (like this). But if the sentence inside the parentheses stands alone, then yes. (Like this one.) Is that not the same everywhere? If everyone would just do it My Way then there wouldn't be this confusion.

*IT'S DELIBERATE. I knew that you would get this, but I couldn't stand the thought of leaving it unnoted in case a random passer-by came and judged me.

Date: 2009-07-20 11:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sinsense.livejournal.com
Your asterisked footnote made me laugh and laugh, thank you.

Right, obviously. That is how we roll as well. I think that's what the above commenter was saying, and I didn't quite understand what they were trying to get across. Righto, then (but you should all do it My Way, obviously).

Profile

slemslempike: (Default)
slemslempike

July 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 02:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios