slemslempike: (nemi: argh)
[personal profile] slemslempike
This is from last week, so apologies if you've already seen it, but this is the Hansard report of the Lords' same-sex marriage debate where several noble friends create RPF about George Clooney:

As the law stands, if I was married to George Clooney and he was to have a sexual affair with, say, the noble Baroness, Lady Thornton, that would be adultery. If I was married to George Clooney and Mr Clooney had sexual relations with the noble Lord, Lord Alli, that would not be adultery because he would not be able to do the sexual act which is very specifically defined in law. Should I wish to divorce Mr Clooney on those grounds, I would do so on the grounds of unreasonable behaviour. In future, if the noble Lord, Lord Alli, was to marry Mr Clooney, and Mr Clooney was to have an affair with me—and who would blame him in those circumstances?—that would be adultery and the noble Lord, Lord Alli, should he choose to, would be able to divorce Mr Clooney on those grounds. If the noble Lord, Lord Alli, were married to Mr Clooney and Mr Clooney had an affair with, say, my noble friend Lord Black of Brentwood—

Lord Black of Brentwood: Hear, hear!

Baroness Stowell of Beeston: That would not be adultery, but the noble Lord, Lord Alli, would be able to divorce Mr Clooney, should he choose to, on the grounds of unreasonable behaviour.


I am particularly fond of "should he choose to", indicating that it would take an awful lot of straws before you got to the final one that would rend such a partnership asunder.

Date: 2013-07-11 10:27 am (UTC)
chiasmata: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chiasmata
That is a thing of beauty.

Date: 2013-07-11 10:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
Well, I see from the internet that Mr C has recently ended a relationship!

Date: 2013-07-11 10:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] widgetfox.livejournal.com
I know that if I were a proper and right-thinking person, I would want the HoL replaced by a democratically elected upper chamber, and I feel bad that I can't. I feel this post helps my cause.

Date: 2013-07-11 11:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
It really does. Of course, there's [livejournal.com profile] webofevil's posts to provide evidence for the prosecution!

Date: 2013-07-11 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] widgetfox.livejournal.com
It isn't that I approve of them. It's that I disapprove of them less than the HoC.

Date: 2013-07-11 11:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
Ah, that is a crucial difference.

Date: 2013-07-11 10:47 am (UTC)
morganmuffle: (Brad&George)
From: [personal profile] morganmuffle
Wow, that really is a thing of beauty!
Edited Date: 2013-07-11 10:47 am (UTC)

Date: 2013-07-11 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
I wonder what Lord Black's civil partner has to say about his "hear hear" intervention! Presumeably "hear hear" again, it's the only rational response.

Date: 2013-07-11 11:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Surely an affair with George Clooney is neither adultery nor unreasonable behaviour, but natural human instinct?

Date: 2013-07-11 11:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sollersuk.livejournal.com
I confess that I have difficulty in thinking of "an affair with George Clooney" and "unreasonable behaviour" in the same breath (still reeling from the idea that being smitten with him could class as a "guilty pleasure")

Date: 2013-07-11 11:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
Well, quite! I imagine that it would be significantly more common to feel guilty about *not* having a crush on George Clooney.

Date: 2013-07-11 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katlinel.livejournal.com
I do, indeed. Well, not so much guilty as baffled as to why I don't get this thing that is apparently universal.

Date: 2013-07-11 06:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
It's practically a diagnostic question: if you find George Clooney a guilty pleasure then you de facto belong to a weird religious sect.

Date: 2013-07-11 11:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
I think that the new marriage vows should be updated to include this. "Forsaking all others, except, of course, George Clooney"...

Date: 2013-07-11 06:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Surely it is universal enough to remain unspoken?

Date: 2013-07-11 11:44 am (UTC)
ext_939: Sheep wearing an eyepatch (boz4pm Blackadder Cunning Plan)
From: [identity profile] spiralsheep.livejournal.com
A perfectly constructed logical argument, with full exposition, all wrapped up in an entertaining example: truly a thing of beauty. My morning has been thoroughly enhanced.

Date: 2013-07-11 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
Glad to have passed it along!

Date: 2013-07-11 01:05 pm (UTC)
starfishchick: (george)
From: [personal profile] starfishchick
That's fabulous. I'm so glad you shared it!

(Hear hear!)

I wonder how George Clooney feels about being used as an example? (I hope he finds it hilarious.)

Date: 2013-07-11 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
I imagine he's very used to being the go-to sexpot by now!

Date: 2013-07-11 01:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sabethea.livejournal.com
This is hilarious and splendid! I love the fact that it's necessary to go through EVERY POSSIBILITY of sex with Mr Clooney (well, except threesomes - maybe they got onto that bit later) :)

Date: 2013-07-11 02:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
Ooh, if the Baroness and Lord Black had a threesome with him, can that be adultery for one of them only?

Date: 2013-07-11 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whatho.livejournal.com
Lord Black of Brentwood: Hear, hear!

That made me laugh out loud in a house that contains other people.

Date: 2013-07-11 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slemslempike.livejournal.com
The joy of the Cloon is spreading!

Profile

slemslempike: (Default)
slemslempike

July 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 04:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios