Not in the flat, no. I might get to check emails during the day, but there are VERY strict regulations about what you can do, and absolutely everything gets logged and I haven't got my head around the freedom of information stuff yet. I guess I'll be on the lookout for cafes with free wifi!
The only ones I know of are Urban Angel (which is a lovely place and definitely worth going to at some point, even if not for the Internet) and Beanscene, one of whose branches may be nearish to you. But people who actually live there doubtless know more! :-)
I think JWire's advanced search has pay/free as a search criterion.
GIVE ME A MARK! YOU ARE SO GOOD AT MARKING. I would give me 42%, actually. I recognised it as a test and gave an answer. A lot of people didn't do that, and they didn't give their answer three times, which is the PREFERRED MANNER OF ANSWERING PROBABLY ACTUALLY. And my answer was ALWAYS the same which shows steadiness and clarity of thought. And my icon has Avon in it. I THINK FAILING ME WAS A BIG MISTAKE and if you were a Better Kind Of Person you would be big enough to admit it.
"This is an answer below the standard most students are expected to achieve. It is a piece of work that lacks evidence of thought, shows a limited ability to research and analyse information, fails to structure an argument and has poor written presentation, but it may have strengths in one of these areas. It will show limited understanding of the question and of relevant literature and examples."
You failed to provide any supporting evidence, but you did show some evidence of thought in choosing to identify the test notification as spam, drawing on personal experience. You were grammatically unimpeachable, though. 42% is good!
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 09:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 09:58 am (UTC)I think JWire's advanced search has pay/free as a search criterion.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:22 pm (UTC)I regret to inform you that you have failed this test.
We do hope that you will retake the test when you have revised more thoroughly.
Best wishes,
ME.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:46 pm (UTC)"This is an answer below the standard most students are expected to achieve. It is a piece of work that lacks evidence of thought, shows a limited ability to research and analyse information, fails to structure an argument and has poor written presentation, but it may have strengths in one of these areas. It will show limited understanding of the question and of relevant literature and examples."
You failed to provide any supporting evidence, but you did show some evidence of thought in choosing to identify the test notification as spam, drawing on personal experience. You were grammatically unimpeachable, though. 42% is good!
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:55 pm (UTC)(Also everyone knows that if you score THE ANSWER TO LIFE THE UNIVERSE AND SO FORTH then you get double points. 84% baby!)